that is basically the "revenge of the mini-net" by michael carpenter. i saw a guy dominate the serps using this method with free hosts. he did keyword-keyword.somefreehost.com he setup 40 of them. then he linked them carefully as heck all in a row. no two sites ever interlinked. just one page to one page etc. all on topic. he put all the keywords in a file, all daisy chained together. then he spammed blogs. he had top 10 rankings for every phrase! and he had like 6 out of the 10 spots.
Would love to see the site. did each section have original content.?
Geeze, sounds like a lot of work. Also sounds like it could be a house of cards just waiting to be brought down with the slightest breath of the algorithm. Wouldn't mind seeing it though, too...
I would vary the link structure myself, make it appear to be more natural.
I think the guy's name was Michael Campbell and his book sells for 80 bucks. I doubt it still has any bearing but am open to other's thoughts.
why wouldn't it still have bearing? themed links do get a slight boost.
Sounds quite well thought out to me.
michael carpenter has free newsletter which is not too bad. the dynamic linking book that was included was also good. basically use java links, block robots to make sure that no pr leak happens. nothing too revolutionary.
Do you think you could daisy chain subdomains around your main domain linking 2 it?, eg http://sd1.incorporateacompany.com http://sd2.incorporateacompany.com back to the main page?
Sounds like a recipe to get banned if you are caught. I know Yahoo has been on the war path dropping sites from their index. I've talked to a few people who were "caught' cheating by google and were subsequently dropped from their index. 'Course if you aren't caught.... :) Sounds like a very interesting setup, though. [size=9:cf9620f21e]Visit the most comprehensive [URL=http://www.lvrealty.net]Las Vegas Real Estate[/URL] and [URL=http://www.realestatebyjacqulyn.com]Henderson Real Estate[/URL] website online. Or look at pictures of my [URL=http://www.geocities.com/jade456us]Parrot[/URL][/size:cf9620f21e]
cross-linking is more likely to get you banned. subdomains would work too, darksat. get links to the satellite domains and then link to the main site. but the main site should never link back
Thats what i figured.
[quote:1f19d2b9d8="edwin"]why wouldn't it still have bearing? themed links do get a slight boost.[/quote:1f19d2b9d8] I Agree. However,if it is simple to do, then it is simple to track and simple to counteract. I am doubting that an $80 book is worth it. I would like to be proven wrong however.
but there's no reason to counteract theming. i also don't think the theming matters a ton. but its like this: if you have 10 links that are all on topic, they probably outweigh 20 links that are off-topic. of course we don't know the exact math though
I dont think any inbound links can hurt you.
There is no such thing as a hurtful inbound link. Otherwise people could take out other sites by linking to them from bad sites. On the topic of theming, does anybody have any more specifics?
Theming is experimental. A lot of people have surmised this, and I think I agree: it is more important in certain industries than others. But the basic idea is this, try to get links from sites that are nearly exact matches in terms of title tags and subject matter. They higher they rank, the better you rank. BigRob is basically describing "feeder sites" or "doorway pages". These things still work and probably always will.